• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文OA文献 >Perbandingan Penerapan Teknik Penilaian Kinerja dan Teknik Penilaian Tertulis Tipe Uraian Terbatas dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Ditinjau dari Hasil Belajar Siswa
【2h】

Perbandingan Penerapan Teknik Penilaian Kinerja dan Teknik Penilaian Tertulis Tipe Uraian Terbatas dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Ditinjau dari Hasil Belajar Siswa

机译：在学生学习成果方面，绩效评估技术和书面评估技术类型描述在数学学习中的应用比较

页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Selection of assessment Technique in study evaluation can influence the result learn the student. Specially in mathematics study, in evaluation of study of assessment technique not only fetched up all standing at written it just by assessment technique but a lot of choice of assessment technique which can awaken the study atmosphere become creative and active. In this case evaluate the study require to be improve repaired to by utilize to improve the result learn the student. Therefore, this research try to compare the technique of performance assessment with the assessment technique written in mathematics study of at discussion fundamental mark with lines and angle corner evaluated from result learn student. This study aims to determine whether there are difference to the results of students mathematics learning among students in group learning by using the techniques of evaluation and performance assessment of students in group learning by using valuation techniques evaluation written description of the type limited to the subject line and angle in class VII SMP 1 Cilimus District Brass. This study is a quasi-experimental research. Affordable population in this study were students of second grade at SMPN 1 Cilimus Academic Year 2014/2015. Samples were selected using random cluster sampling technique, was elected class VII.7 the number of students 36 people and VII.8 by the number of students 37 people as the sample. The research instrument used in the form of tests. The average math student learning outcomes in the experimental group I in both categories, shown by the average number of 84,93 with a standard deviation of 5,98 and the average math student learning outcomes in the experimental group II in both categories, indicated by the numbers an average of 81,39 with a standard deviation of 6,08. Hypothesis test results conclude that there are difference to the results of students\u27 mathematics learning among students in group learning by using the techniques of evaluation and performance assessment of students in group learning by using valuation techniques evaluation written description of the type limited to the subject line and angle in class VII SMPN 1 Cilimus District Brass at significance level of 5%.
机译：学习评估中评估技术的选择会影响学生学习的结果。特别是在数学研究中，在评估技术研究的评估中，不仅仅仅依靠评估技术就可以将其全部写作，而且可以唤醒研究气氛的许多评估技术选择变得富有创造力和积极性。在这种情况下评估学习需要通过利用改进结果来学习和改进。因此，本研究试图将绩效评估技术与讨论中基本标志的数学研究中所写的评估技术进行比较，并从结果学习者那里评估出线和角。本研究旨在通过评估技术和绩效评估的方法来确定小组学习中学生的数学学习结果是否存在差异。和角度在VII SMP 1 Cilimus District Brass中。这项研究是一项准实验研究。本研究中的可负担人群是2014/2015 SMPN 1 Cilimus学术年级的二年级学生。使用随机聚类抽样技术选择样本，分别将VII.7级学生人数36人和VII.8级学生人数37人选为样本。研究仪器以测试形式使用。两个类别中实验组I的平均数学学生学习成果，以84.93的平均数（标准偏差为5,98）和两个类别中实验组II的平均数学学生学习成果，表示为该数字平均为81,39，标准偏差为6,08。假设检验结果得出结论：使用评估技术和小组评估学生的学习成绩，小组学习中学生的数学学习结果与评估技术的评估书面描述仅限于主题类型VII类SMPN 1锡利莫斯区黄铜中的直线和角度，显着性水平为5％。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号